Amanda Onalaja
January 12, 2010
AP English – III
Booker T. Washington, founder of the Tuskegee Institute, has always had, in my humble opinion, a creative way of wanting to establish the African American race. The opposite of W.E.B. DuBois’ “liberal approach”, Washington insisted on a vocational one, whereas give my race work and let us earn our keep; a view that has always earned my disapproval and criticism. However, in the chapter titled “The Atlantic Exposition Address”, from his autobiography, Up From Slavery, Washington illustrates the method behind the madness.
Ultimately at the Atlanta Exposition, Washington wanted to deliver a speech that would, “cement the friendship of the races and bring about hearty cooperation between them”. The reaction to his speech was better than he expected, but I couldn’t help but wonder why else they wouldn’t be. He preached that, “No race can prosper till it learns that there is as much dignity in tilling a field as in writing a poem. It is at the bottom of life we must begin and not at the top”, I agree that African Americans should not be ashamed to work, but it’s unconstitutional to have to work for our respect in a Nation that is equally our own. He follows with, “Nor should we permit our grievances to overshadow our opportunities”. In other words Washington believed that, we shouldn’t take a mile when we were barely offered an inch, but it is my argument that that inch and that mile should have been equally ours to claim. Washington harbored good intentions, but he chose the easy way out, and I believe anything worth struggling over, is work fighting for. After two centuries of tolling in soil and being degraded, I refuse to do the same thing over under slightly different conditions.
He was praised for wanting blacks to stay subordinates, “Just as soon as the South gets over the old feeling that it is being forced by "foreigners," or "aliens," to do something which it does not want to do, I believe that the change in the direction that I have indicated is going to begin”, until the whites allow them into civil society. He seemed to criticize DuBois’ theories by stating, “think, though, that the opportunity to freely exercise such political rights will not come in any large degree through outside or artificial forcing, but will be accorded to the Negro by the Southern white people themselves”, rebutting DuBois’ liberal education wants.
All in all I find it wrong to condemn Washington for his peaceful views. His ideal was the succession of the African American race regardless of what his methods were. He was probably right, even though some are too ignorant to take a glance at his perspective.